#785 · Sat Nov 4, 07:00 AM

guym@c-g (Guy MacArthur) writes:

> I think there should be a “” relational operator like “&&” and ”||”.
> It would be easier to write for loops where one out of a series of conditions must fail to break the loop.
> E.g. for ( ; x y z .. ; )

The example you give does not match the description. “one out of a series of conditions must fail to break the loop” implies that the conditions should be logically ANDed together. The above loop breaks only when an ODD NUMBER of the conditions fail. I have not (in my experience) had an enormous demand for a simple way to express that criterion.
—
Chris Volpe
GE Corporate R&D
Email: volpecr@crd.ge.com

-- David --

...